|
|
|
|
Droning on...and on...and
on...and on...and on... |
|
Lies, Lies, and more damned
lies... |
|
|
|
HAMISH DIXON'S DIARY |
|
 |
|
Friday, February 25, 2005
CONVERSAZIONE ROYALE
It's been a hectic time, the last few weeks. Big Ears has been fucking things up on the home front again, and as usual he's come crying to old Hamish for help. It really does take one's breath away, the mess that lot make of things. And all this for a raddled old crow, when I could keep him supplied with uncomplaining virginal young flesh from Bridge of Scrapie (with the added excitement of an almost impenetrable scots accent) until he's too old to get his Hanoverian organ into action.
"But what am I going to do, Hamish?" he whined at me down the blower yesterday. "It's all right for you, you have no reputation. But I am of the blood royal. These things matter when you're headed for the top job."
"Your wife to be shoved an unlubricated broom handle 18 inches up my rectum and landed me in hospital for a month," I gently pointed out.
"Oh, but that was all in fun," said the twerp.
"Fun for who?"
"Well," he said with definite relish, "she can get a bit carried away, I admit. Sometimes I'm just black and blue after an active night."
"Puleeze don't tell me," I said, "or I'll have to hang up."
"Hanging up's not the half of it, I can tell you," squeaked the little prince, his voice rising in excitement. "Oh, it reminds of my days at Gordonstoun! Such brute force! Such manly musculature!"
|
|
and on...and on...and on...and on
|
|
|
|
Disclaimer: To
all intents and purposes the contents of this web site are entirely
untrustworthy. While it is possible, but by no means certain, that
the opinions expressed may indeed be those of the writer, the facts
upon which the opinions are based may well be wrong, and whatever
isactually stated as fact can be virtually relied upon to be false.
In any case, the reader can never be certain who the writer actually
is, and therefore is in no position to judge his or her relative truthfulness.
In the event that you read something that you know to be true, you
should not assume that the presence in an article of that one true
nugget implies that anything else in the article is true, because
it almost certainly is not. It follows that readers should not be
misled into assuming, when they stumble across the occasional article
which is substantially, or even completely, true that the website
is moving towards a greater global veracity, and that therefore more
credence can be attached to its entire contents. Such an assumption
would be entirely wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|