|
|
|
|
Droning on...and on...and
on...and on...and on... |
|
Lies, Lies, and more damned
lies... |
|
|
|
HAMISH DIXON'S DIARY |
|
 |
|
Tuesday, December 21, 2004
TOUGH LOVE FROM BIG-EARS'S 'ER INDOORS
Rory was carted off screaming like a baby after I crushed his foot, and Camilla punished me by shoving me into the shower and hosing me down with ice-cold water.
"Is that any way to treat your only son?" she said.
"I disown him," I said. "He's an effete little faggot."
"For a man who currently has no penis, Hamish," said the royal floozie, "I must say you've got quite a nerve." She blew more Benson & Hedges smoke into my face. "Anyway, you'd better watch your step. HRH has gone off back to London to deal with the misbehavior of that vile brat Prince Barry, and he was the only reason I haven't already pulled out all your finger nails."
Sunday, December 19, 2004
FILIAL DUTY
Rory tracked down where I was being held the other day and came knocking on the door. He managed to penetrate Chateau Big-Ears all the way to the leather-lined "entertainment" room where they keep me loosely manacled to the wall.
"Hi Dad," he said, with all the originality I have come to expect of my barely present son.
"Rory, old boy," I said, "Thank heaven you're here. How are we going to get out?"
"I've come with some papers for you to sign, Dad," he said, looking straight through me.
"I'm not signing anything," I said.
Rory pressed a button on the wall and Slobbo came in and hit my foot with a sledge hammer. I shat myself and passed out.
|
|
and on...and on...and on...and on
|
|
|
|
Disclaimer: To
all intents and purposes the contents of this web site are entirely
untrustworthy. While it is possible, but by no means certain, that
the opinions expressed may indeed be those of the writer, the facts
upon which the opinions are based may well be wrong, and whatever
isactually stated as fact can be virtually relied upon to be false.
In any case, the reader can never be certain who the writer actually
is, and therefore is in no position to judge his or her relative truthfulness.
In the event that you read something that you know to be true, you
should not assume that the presence in an article of that one true
nugget implies that anything else in the article is true, because
it almost certainly is not. It follows that readers should not be
misled into assuming, when they stumble across the occasional article
which is substantially, or even completely, true that the website
is moving towards a greater global veracity, and that therefore more
credence can be attached to its entire contents. Such an assumption
would be entirely wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|