|
|
|
|
Droning on...and on...and
on...and on...and on... |
|
Lies, Lies, and more damned
lies... |
|
|
|
HAMISH DIXON'S DIARY |
|
 |
|
Thursday, October 28, 2004
GRABBED ON FIFTH
I was walking up the street the other day -- something from the past told me that it was Fifth Avenue -- when a limousine screeched to a halt beside me.
"Could that louse-laden bundle be old Hamish Dixon?" said a voice from deep inside the leather-lined interior.
"No it fucking well isn't," I said, taking another swig at the bottle of malt liquor of which I've become so fond and staggering on. At the time I said it, I was quite sure I'd had enough of Hamish Dixon.
"Slobbo," said the invisible limo rider, "grab him."
"Oo me?" said Slobbo, the invisible rider's driver. "But 'e stinks. 'E's deesgusding. Eugh!" "Slobbo," said the voice, "take a look at him."
Slobbo came up and peered at me more closely, holding his nose as he did so.
"Now," said the voice, "Is that your ex-employer Hamish Dixon, or is it not?"
"Look like 'eem," said Slobbo. "But 'e steel steenk. Sure you wanneem inda car weeth you?"
"I have the air-mask I bought after 9/11," said the voice. "If he's too disgusting, I'll cover up."
"You the boss," said Slobbo.
"We'll take him home and hose him down," said the voice.
Slobbo grabbed me ungently and shoved me into the car. I looked at the erstwhile invisible man.
"Well, Hamish," he said, "what a surprise to find you in this state!"
I had absolutely no idea whatever who this rich fuckwit was who'd kidnapped me. What I did know, however, was that I could feel some sort of inverse stirring in my loins.
"Is this tart-trap a Maybach?" I asked.
|
|
and on...and on...and on...and on
|
|
|
|
Disclaimer: To
all intents and purposes the contents of this web site are entirely
untrustworthy. While it is possible, but by no means certain, that
the opinions expressed may indeed be those of the writer, the facts
upon which the opinions are based may well be wrong, and whatever
isactually stated as fact can be virtually relied upon to be false.
In any case, the reader can never be certain who the writer actually
is, and therefore is in no position to judge his or her relative truthfulness.
In the event that you read something that you know to be true, you
should not assume that the presence in an article of that one true
nugget implies that anything else in the article is true, because
it almost certainly is not. It follows that readers should not be
misled into assuming, when they stumble across the occasional article
which is substantially, or even completely, true that the website
is moving towards a greater global veracity, and that therefore more
credence can be attached to its entire contents. Such an assumption
would be entirely wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|