|
|
|
|
Droning on...and on...and
on...and on...and on... |
|
Lies, Lies, and more damned
lies... |
|
|
|
HAMISH DIXON'S DIARY |
|
 |
|
Sunday, August 01, 2004
TITIANNA'S DAD DEAD MAN WALKING
The car rental people were unsympathetic to my explanation of the complete trashing of the Porsche. It also transpires that tiTianna, although she looks 25, is only in fact 16. Probably the result of smoking since she was 9. So, discretion being the better part of valor, I decided that pursuing her father for the money for the car, at the risk of being locked up for statutory rape, was not in line with my superior intelligence.
My seduction of tiTianna accordingly cost me $45,000.
Without wishing to be ungallant, I have to say that she was not worth it.
Her dad, who glories in the name of Paulie Prostate, is apparently big in garbage haulage in Queens. Vinny assures me he can be dealt with without annoying anyone big. I have therefore asked Vinny to deal with him. He will start with the body of the Escalade, and then move on to Paulie's own tattoo-emblazoned flesh. Vengeance is sweet, oh so very sweet.
I have, meanwhile, been back in the city and visiting Wanda in her apartment at the Pierre on a daily basis. She has definitely been practicing with someone else, as she has a whole new bag of tricks. As it is a very high quality bag, however, I am loath to complain. The sensual benefits accruing to me from her brazen infidelity are too substantial to permit petty jealousy. The things she has learned to do with her tongue must surely be illegal.
|
|
and on...and on...and on...and on
|
|
|
|
Disclaimer: To
all intents and purposes the contents of this web site are entirely
untrustworthy. While it is possible, but by no means certain, that
the opinions expressed may indeed be those of the writer, the facts
upon which the opinions are based may well be wrong, and whatever
isactually stated as fact can be virtually relied upon to be false.
In any case, the reader can never be certain who the writer actually
is, and therefore is in no position to judge his or her relative truthfulness.
In the event that you read something that you know to be true, you
should not assume that the presence in an article of that one true
nugget implies that anything else in the article is true, because
it almost certainly is not. It follows that readers should not be
misled into assuming, when they stumble across the occasional article
which is substantially, or even completely, true that the website
is moving towards a greater global veracity, and that therefore more
credence can be attached to its entire contents. Such an assumption
would be entirely wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|